From roby Wed Dec 11 14:25:08 1996
Return-Path: <roby>
Received: by cronus.csed.ida.org (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id OAA10406; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 14:25:07 -0500
From: roby (Clyde Roby)
Message-Id: <199612111925.OAA10406@cronus.csed.ida.org>
Subject: more definitions for Glossary?
To: ASIS-Officers@SW-Eng.Falls-Church.Va.US (asis-officers)
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 14:25:06 -0500 (EST)
Cc: roby (me)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 649
Status: OR

All,

	As we performed a review over the ASIS specification
at last week's ASISWG meeting, I noticed that the specification
contains some commentary code which includes definitions of
terms which I don't think are included in the Glossary.  Should
these terms be included?

	I just performed a search over the source and the following
terms are present: ANCESTORS of a unit; DESCENDANTS of a unit,
SUPPORTERS of a unit, DEPENDENTS of a unit, FAMILY of a unit,
NEEDED UNITS of a unit, CLOSURE of a unit (used common definition).

	For those that aren't in the Glossary, should they be?
If so, should we use what's in the specification source?

Clyde