!editorial comment 071
!topic Paragraph is difficult to understand.
!reference ASIS 95-12.1
!from Ron Price 97-03-10
!keywords paragraph clarity
!discussion  
--    Each pairing defines an inconsistent semantic dependence relationship.
--    The second unit of each pair depends semantically on the first unit.
--    All units appearing second (units with even numbered list indexes) are 
--    always considered to be inconsistent and will not appear in the consistent
--    units list.  Units appearing first can be either consistent units that 
--    also appear in the consistent units list, or can be inconsistent units 
--    that are part of an inconsistent transitive relationship.

Recommended Changes:
--    Each pairing defines an inconsistent semantic dependence relationship.  The right
--    unit of each pair semantically depends on the preceding left unit.  All rightmost
--    units of each pair are always inconsistent, and will not appear in the consistent
--    units list.  The leftmost unit can be either consistent or inconsistent. If a 
--    leftmost unit is consistent then it also appears in the consistent units list; 
--    otherwise the unit is part of an inconsistent transitive relationship.

NOTE:
1) If the recommendation is accepted then the following paragraph will also have the modified:
--    The list indicates that units C, B, and A are inconsistent (the second
--    units of each pair).  Semantic dependencies such as B depends on C 
--    also are indicated.  The units C, B, and A are in an order that could be
--    submitted to the compiler (a possible recompilation order).

Further Modifications:
--    The list indicates that units C, B, and A are inconsistent (the rightmost
--    units of each pair).  Semantic dependencies such as B depends on C 
--    also are indicated.  The units C, B, and A are in an order that could be
--    submitted to the compiler (a possible recompilation order).

!resolution  Accept.
Provided replacement paragraph is used for clarification.